DAST vs SAST in Secure Software Development Lifecycles
SAST and DAST catch different vulnerabilities at different stages, so secure development needs both.
Editor at Large
Dana Kovac covers software supply chain security, ci and production environment consistency and ai agent development environments for Build Stack Review.
12 stories
SAST and DAST catch different vulnerabilities at different stages, so secure development needs both.
Feature flags let teams ship incomplete code safely by decoupling deployment from release.
Trigger configuration silently determines which environment state your pipeline actually tests.
Framework choice matters less than whether the agent can drift its own environment.
AI-suggested dependencies bypass provenance checks, creating a new attack surface.
Your packaging choice determines whether your MCP server behaves consistently and securely.
Discover whether your codebase can actually rebuild from its declared environment.
Teams lose sprints to architecture mismatches between developer laptops, CI, and production.
Teams split between macOS and Linux can now share identical tool versions.
How standardized tooling prevents environment drift across macOS, Linux, and WSL2.
Nix and container tools can bridge the reproducibility gap between macOS, Linux, and WSL2 builds.
Separate runtime pinning from dependency locking to eliminate environment drift across your team.